McManis, Charlene Willing and Traci Sorell. Indian No More. First edition. New York, Tu Books, an imprint of Lee & Low Books, Inc, 2019.

Indian No More is a story of two young girls relocating after the government has taken away their “Indian” status, otherwise known as termination. Termination was a very real policy, starting in 1953. A quick google search will give plenty of hits on the relocation laws. The family in the book are relocated to a neighborhood in LA. This is a time in America where segregation still existed and a Native American family would be considered a nonwhite family. The neighbors surrounding the Native family in the book are also nonwhite, allowing the author to present scenes of discrimination. There is also the use of the ‘n’ word in this book, creating a great opportunity for an adult to have an important conversation with a young reader about discrimination and hateful language.
The story seems to move along in a way that is in tune with the times. The plot is loosely based on one of the coauthor’s lives, so there is a great sense of accuracy. The language and tone that are set in the story seem authentic and there is a deep sense of the discomfort of the family as they try to align themselves with an American way of life. There is a tone of sadness that creeps in throughout the reading, expertly set by the authors. That tone puts readers right in the living room of the young Native girls, a living room with a new t.v. at that. This is a beautifully written story that presents a time in history that isn’t often written about. It is apparent that the authors went to great lengths to ensure accuracy and authenticity and it shows.
* Note * I used Howard University’s informational page on termination to confirm accuracy. I also used the information provided by the authors in the back of the book to determine the level of expertise involved.
https://library.law.howard.edu/civilrightshistory/indigenous/termination
Cline-Ransome, Lesa. Finding Langston. New York, Holiday House, 2019

Finding Langston is a short novel meant to capture The Great Migration, a time when approximately 6 million black people moved north. The story is centered around a young boy and his father that moved north to Chicago after the boy’s mother died. There isn’t an exact timeline provided in the book, but there are clues offered, as well as a note at the end of the book stating that the story takes place during that time. The setting seems to accurately depict the general time frame being conveyed, but the time frame is more like a background to the central plot. Since the story is really centered around a young boy at a difficult time in his life, the background politics and tone seem to be understated. At the forefront of this novel is the boy’s love for books and his escape into a library, a place he wasn’t able to enter in his hometown. The Hall Branch of the Chicago Public Library was the first to have an African American branch manager and became a meeting place for writers like Langston Hughes. The love of this library is central to the story line, more than other aspects of the setting. The whole book is not only a love letter to Hughes, but to Hall, the man behind the library branch that meant so much to so many.
*Note* I used the Hall Branch website and the National Archives to corroborate information.
https://www.archives.gov/research/african-americans/migrations/great-migration
https://www.chipublib.org/about-hall-branch/
Rinaldi, Ann. My Heart Is On the Ground: The Diary of Nannie Little Rose, a Sioux Girl Scholastic, 1999.

The first two novels discussed were beautifully written, with time spent on accuracy. My Heart Is On the Ground is a different account. For starters, the language used in this book is problematic at best. A line from page 9 reads, “When I show her, she reads my writing and I am getting much excited to know I have write something a white person can read (Rinaldi, 9).” There is no need for this Native girl to sound so simple and so ready to please the white man. Not only is this uncomfortable to read, it is also historically inaccurate. In fact, this book has been ridiculed harshly for its inaccuracies.
Cynthia Smith writes of the outrage surrounding the book published by Scholastic. In this book, documenting a Sioux girl’s journey, the boarding school the Native American children were sent to was portrayed as a pleasant time in the girl’s life, when in actuality, Native children were sent there without the ability to leave and many died from the conditions. A line from page 93 reads, “ [Mr. Captain Pratt] said school is almost over for the year and he is most proud of us. He said this summer some children will go home. Others will go on ‘outings’ (Rinaldi, 93).” This is a stark contrast from what was actually experienced. In fact, Smith cites Pratt as a man with a philosophy of “Kill the Indian, save the man.” Under his administration, the school was set up to break spirits, to destroy traditional extended families and cultures, to obliterate memories and languages, and especially to make the children deny their Indianness, inside and out (Smith).” This seems like an instance that a book should be pulled front the shelf, but it seems to still be a party of many collections.
https://rethinkingschools.org/articles/fiction-posing-as-truth-a-critical-review-of-ann-rinaldi-s-my-heart-is-on-the-ground-the-diary-of-nannie-little-rose-a-sioux-girl/